Europe: EU rules impede asylum protection
04 June 2013

The Hangar Open Centre in Hal-Far, Malta. People sent back to Malta via Dublin procedures are often returned here to this 'container village'. (JRS)
Protection interrupted, The Dublin Regulation's Impact on Asylum Seekers' Protection, A Summary
Protection interrupted The Dublin Regulation's Impact on Asylum Seekers' Protection
On average, the people we interviewed had been removed from three to four EU countries, with much of that time spent in a detention centre. People are split from their families, and are overwhelmed by a rigid system that overlooks their protection needs, says Mr Philip Amaral of JRS Europe.


Complex procedures and the rigidity of the EU asylum system are key factors that interrupt people's search for protection, says JRS Report


Brussels, 04 June 2013 – Asylum seekers in Europe are often faced with EU rules that hinder their ability to seek asylum in an EU country where they would feel most protected. This is according to a new JRS Europe report, Protection Interrupted, released today. The report is based on interviews with 257 asylum seekers and migrants in nine EU countries.
 
"In June, the EU will adopt a new Common European Asylum System, and the 'Dublin Regulation' is a centrepiece of this system. But for an asylum seeker, this regulation is a key source of frustration, anxiety and thwarted access to protection", says Philip Amaral of JRS Europe and author of the report.
 
The report outlines in several ways how the Dublin Regulation impedes an asylum seeker's search for protection in Europe
. Firstly is people's lack of knowledge about how the regulation actually works and what their rights are. About half of the project's interviewees claimed to know little or nothing about Dublin, and nor did they know how to appeal their case before a court.  Secondly, people are frequently transferred to EU countries that do not offer decent housing and basic services, leaving many people homeless and destitute. Thirdly, asylum seekers are detained in multiple EU countries, seemingly for no other reason than being an asylum seeker.
 
"On average, the people we interviewed had been removed from three to four EU countries, with much of that time spent in a detention centre. People are split from their families, and are overwhelmed by a rigid system that overlooks their protection needs", says Mr Amaral.
 
Being shuffled around the EU takes its toll on asylum seekers. For our study we interviewed a 23-year-old Ahmad, from Afghanistan, who came to the EU in 2009 via Greece and travelled through Macedonia and Serbia to get to Hungary. He made several attempts to travel to Germany, Austria and Switzerland; each time he was sent back to Hungary. Between Ahmad's first arrival to Europe and our meeting with him, he had spent most of his time in a detention centre. During one of his last times in Switzerland, Ahmad tried to hang himself, but was saved at the last moment by detention centre guards.
 
The Dublin Regulation was adopted by the EU in 2003 to identify which EU member states would be responsible for examining an asylum application. But problems emerged with its implementation in EU countries. A European Commission evaluation of the system in 2007 revealed several shortcomings, such as people's difficulties with continuing their asylum claim in the responsible EU country, and people being kept apart from their families.
 
A major problem revealed by the JRS Europe study are the divergent asylum procedures and basic conditions found among EU countries. Asylum seekers in France, for example, must often sleep at train stations or in parks because housing is not provided. In Belgium, asylum seekers in a Dublin procedure are routinely detained, but in Sweden many are not. Though Italian law requires that asylum seekers in Dublin procedures are given housing, in practice many are not. In Germany, lawyers are dissuaded from helping asylum seekers because state reimbursement rates are too low.
 
"In order for the Common European Asylum System to be sustainable, there must actually be a common level of protection guaranteed across all EU countries", argues Mr Amaral.
 
"At present this is not the case. People frequently move throughout Europe because they are searching for protection that, to them, is of a dignified and fair standard. An asylum system that leaves people on the street, and ill-equipped to enforce their rights, is not sustainable", continues Mr Amaral.

In its study, JRS Europe identified several actions European governments can take to make the system more humane, protective and dignified. Adequate reception conditions, such as decent housing, medical care and basic subsistence allowances are very important, as asylum seekers have little else to rely on because most are barred from working. Improving the way people are informed about Dublin procedures, in languages they can understand, is crucial. It is especially important to enable greater access to qualified lawyers, since having a lawyer greatly increases the likelihood that one will be better informed and able to enforce one's rights, such as to challenge a case before a judge.
 
Above all, the study finds that people feel better protected when they can personally influence the decisions governments take on their asylum cases. Rather than transferring people back to the country where they first entered into the EU, which is how states typically implement the Dublin Regulation, people should have more chances to seek asylum in countries where their family and relatives are, where they share a language and where the protection standards best fit their needs.
 
"Personal choice for any person is connected to the fulfilment of basic human needs, and a sense of personal dignity and self-determination. These principles should be at the heart of the European asylum system", concludes Mr Amaral.

#ENDS#

Contact information:
Philip Amaral, Advocacy & Communications Coordinator
JRS Europe, Brussels
Tel:     +32 2 250 32 23
Mobile:    +32 485 173 766
Email:    europe.advocacy@jrs.net

Notes to the editors:
The report, Protection Interrupted, will be released at a public event in Brussels on 4th June, at the Silken Berlaymont Hotel from 09:30 to 12:30. A pre-conference press briefing for journalists will be held at the same venue from 09:00 to 09:30 sharp. Speaking at the full conference will be:
  • Philip Amaral, author of the report and research coordinator
  • Cecilia Wikström, MEP (Liberals/Sweden), lead Parliament negotiator on the new Dublin Regulation
  • Stephen Ryan, European Commission, DG Home, Deputy Head of Unit – Asylum & Relations with EASO
  • Emilie Wiinblad, UNHCR, Senior Policy Officer
  • Maria Hennessy, ECRE, co-author of a recent report on the Dublin Regulation entitled, Lives on Hold.
  • Heiko Habbe, JRS Germany
  • Nicolette Busuttil, JRS Malta
  • Katarzyna Przybyslawska, Halina Niec Legal Aid Centre (Poland)
  • Claire Salignat, Forum réfugiés-Cosi (France)
The full conference and pre-conference press briefing will be held only in English (no interpretation).

'Ahmad' is not the real name of the asylum seeker profiled in this article.

The Jesuit Refugee Service is a global Catholic non-governmental organisation with a mission to accompany, serve and advocate for refugees and forced migrants in more than 50 countries around the world. In Europe, JRS is present in 12 countries – including in Morocco, Ukraine, Macedonia and Croatia – where staff and volunteers visit immigration detention centres, provide services to destitute migrants and ensure access to protection for migrants at Europe's borders.

The 'Dublin Regulation' is an EU law adopted in 2003 to assign member state responsibility for an individual asylum claim. Among the criteria used to decide responsibility, the one used most often is the first EU country an asylum seeker arrived to.




Press Contact Information
James Stapleton
international.communications@jrs.net
+39 06 69 868 468